Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is much better than Moto E6 Plus's overall score of 73.4. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, it must be noted that it is also a just a little thicker and way heavier phone. The Galaxy A80 counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a little bit bigger display, a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a better display density.
The Moto E6 Plus counts with a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A80 has a bit better CPU than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A80 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A80 takes much better photographs and videos than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a F2 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has a way better video resolution, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has superior battery performance than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.