Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is better than the Moto E6 Plus, getting a general score of 87.1 against 73.4. Although Galaxy Note9 is better than Moto E6 Plus, it must be noted that it is also an older, just a little thicker and heavier phone. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a much better display than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a way better amount of pixels per inch of screen, a bit bigger display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
The Galaxy Note9 has a very superior storage for applications and games than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy Note9 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note9 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note9 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with greater battery duration than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Galaxy Note9 captures better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a camera with lesser mega pixels, it also counts with a lot bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures, a bigger back camera sensor and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.