Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, having a overall score of 79.3 against 73.4. The Galaxy S6 edge+ body is incredibly thinner than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, although it's just a little heavier and was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has the previous 5.1 version while Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better display pixels density and a way better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Motorola Moto E6 Plus features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Moto E6 Plus also has more CPU cores.
Moto E6 Plus counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto E6 Plus also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ captures much better photos and videos than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a better resolution camera, a larger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality, a larger diafragm aperture and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Motorola Moto E6 Plus and the Galaxy S6 edge+ both have very similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.