Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the Moto E6 Plus, getting a 77.8 score against 73.4. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a a lot newer and extremely thinner cellphone than Moto E6 Plus, but it is notably heavier. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version and Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better screen than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a much higher 2200 x 2480px resolution, a way bigger display and a greater count of pixels per display inch. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto E6 Plus counts with a much better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures way better photos and videos than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a lot higher video resolution and a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Moto E6 Plus, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.