Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-25 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.89 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Navy blue and Starry black | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 293 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is much better than the Moto E6's 67 global score. Although Google Pixel 3 is older than the Moto E6, it's design is a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a sharper screen than Moto E6, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 3 also has a better pixels amount in each inch of display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2160px.
Google Pixel 3 features a bit more memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto E6, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 3 has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto E6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 has a slightly better camera than Moto E6, because although it has a lesser MP resolution camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures.
The Moto E6 has just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Google Pixel 3 is a bit more expensive than Moto E6, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.