Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is better than Moto E7 Plus, getting a overall score of 85 against 75.7. Despite of the fact that iPhone 8 is much older than the Moto E7 Plus, it's construction is somewhat thinner and notably lighter. Apple iPhone 8 has a quite better performance than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has 2 less cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone 8 has a sharper display than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a way smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch. IPhone 8 features a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with just a bit better camera than iPhone 8, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has a camera with a way better resolution, a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture.
The Moto E7 Plus counts with a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.