Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is better than Moto E7 Plus, getting an 84.5 score against 75.7. Even though the iPhone XS Max is older and a bit heavier than the Moto E7 Plus, it's body is still thinner. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a superior hardware performance than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The iPhone XS Max has a much better looking display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a display with the same size, the iPhone XS Max also has a much better 1242 x 2688px resolution and a much greater count of pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Moto E7 Plus has a bit better camera than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and video, a camera with way more MP and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Moto E7 Plus counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto E7 Plus also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus has a superior battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.