Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than the Moto E7 Plus, getting an 81.6 score against 75.7. Even though Google Pixel 2 is older than Moto E7 Plus, it's body is way lighter and thinner. Google Pixel 2 counts with a brighter display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a much better number of pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 2 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto E7 Plus. They have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Moto E7 Plus counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Moto E7 Plus also has a larger aperture, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, better video frame rate and a much bigger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The Moto E7 Plus counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.