Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 is a little bit better than the Moto E7 Plus, getting a 77 score against 75.7. The LG V20 design is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto E7 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. The LG V20 features a better looking display than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a much greater screen pixel density.
LG V20 counts with a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V20 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V20's processor is just as good as the Motorola Moto E7 Plus one, and although the LG V20 has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), they both have the same RAM amount.
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a really longer battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 56 percent larger battery capacity. The Moto E7 Plus features a superior camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Moto E7 Plus also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a back facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution, a larger camera aperture and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.