Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is much better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 general score. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 10 operating system. LG V50 ThinQ's design is a bit lighter and just a little thinner than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released around 17 months before.
LG V50 ThinQ features an incredibly better display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater pixels amount per screen inch and a lot better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ features a superior memory for games and applications than Moto E7 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The Moto E7 Plus features a little bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Moto E7 Plus also counts with a much bigger camera sensor and a much more MP back-facing camera.
Moto E7 Plus counts with superior battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.