Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is just a bit better than the Moto E7 Plus, getting a score of 77.9 against 75.7. The Motorola DROID Turbo is a much older and somewhat thicker phone than Moto E7 Plus, but Motorola was able to build it lighter anyway. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola DROID Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a way better screen than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a lot more pixels per screen inch.
Moto E7 Plus features much more memory for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto E7 Plus also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto E7 Plus has improved battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3900mAh.
The Moto E7 Plus captures better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto E7 Plus also has faster video frame rate, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and video and a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.