Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-16 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is a bit better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, having a score of 82.3 against 75.7. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy A60 has 11 version while Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version, providing some additional features. The Galaxy A60 design is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released about 15 months before.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A60 counts with a sharper screen than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per screen inch and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Moto E7 Plus has a superior camera than Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same video definition, the Moto E7 Plus also has a back facing camera with lot more MP, higher video frame rates and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Moto E7 Plus counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Moto E7 Plus has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.