Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a score of 84.2, which is much better than the Moto E7 Plus's global score of 75.7. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)'s construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto E7 Plus, despite of the fact that it was released around 23 months before. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a sharper screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixels amount per inch of display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2220.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Moto E7 Plus features a much longer battery life than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.