Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, getting a 91.8 score against 75.7. Although Galaxy A71 5G and Motorola Moto E7 Plus were released with only 3 months difference, Galaxy A71 5G is just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version while Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version, providing some additional features and optimized performance.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a brighter screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because it has a higher display pixel density, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bigger display. Galaxy A71 5G features a little better performance than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 5G features a better camera than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera, a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.