Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is much better than Moto E7 Plus's general score of 75.7. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy A80's body is older, just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than Moto E7 Plus. Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A80 features a much better screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a greater pixels number per screen inch and a little larger display. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, a same size sensor and a back-facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has higher 60 fps video frame rate and a larger aperture.
Moto E7 Plus features a bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Moto E7 Plus has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.