Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-09-16 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is much better than Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 score. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is an older and a little heavier cellphone than Moto E7 Plus, but Samsung was able to build it a little thinner anyway. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android OS, while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 OS.
The Galaxy A90 5G has just a bit better processing power than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a better looking display than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400, more pixels per display inch and a quite larger display.
The Galaxy A90 5G takes a bit better videos and photos than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same resolution back camera and the same back camera sensor size, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a lot higher video quality.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 64 GB more internal memory. Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.