Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 is better than the Moto E7 Plus, with a global score of 86.5 against 75.7. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy M31 has the newer 11 version while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10, so it gives you lots of additional features. The Galaxy M31 is a a little thinner and a little lighter cellphone than Moto E7 Plus, although they were released only 6 months apart.
The Galaxy M31 features a much better screen than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy M31 has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy M31 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy M31 has as much memory capacity to install applications and games as Moto E7 Plus, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M31 takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way higher 64 MP resolution back camera, a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Galaxy M31 counts with better battery lifetime than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a 20% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.