Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ is a little bit better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, having a global score of 79.3 against 75.7. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has the older 5.1 version and Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S6 edge+ is older than the Motorola Moto E7 Plus, it's design is noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter.
Moto E7 Plus counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Moto E7 Plus also has 7 more cores (but slower). Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and way more pixels per inch in the screen.
Moto E7 Plus counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto E7 Plus also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Moto E7 Plus counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Moto E7 Plus has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Moto E7 Plus also has a much larger camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos, a camera with a much higher resolution, higher video frame rates and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.