Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-07-28 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.48 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2470mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is much better than Moto G (2015)'s 65.2 overall score. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has newer 10 version and Moto G (2015) has Android 5.1 version, so it counts with lots of additional features. Even though LG V50 ThinQ is somewhat heavier than Moto G (2015), it's way thinner and notably newer.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G (2015), because it has a much better 1440 x 3120px resolution, a way greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a larger screen. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better performance than Motorola Moto G (2015), because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
LG V50 ThinQ features a better camera than Moto G (2015), because although it has a less megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments and a much higher (4K) video quality. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G (2015), because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto G (2015), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2470mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Moto G (2015).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.