Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.2 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 4.0 |
| 2015-07-28 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.48 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 306 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 7.83 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2470mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.4 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket has a score of 71.5, which is slightly better than Moto G (2015)'s 65.2 score. The Galaxy S III Cricket is a way thinner and lighter phone than the Moto G (2015). Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S III Cricket has older 4.0 version and Moto G (2015) has Android 5.1.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a little sharper display than Moto G (2015), because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same 1280 x 720 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with a bit better display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a bit faster processor than Moto G (2015), and although they both have a 2 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket also has a graphics processing unit and a greater number of cores.
Moto G (2015) counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Moto G (2015) also has a camera with way more mega pixels and a much bigger diafragm aperture. The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G (2015), because it has 32 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 64 GB.
The Moto G (2015) features longer battery performance than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has an 18% bigger battery size.
The Galaxy S III Cricket not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.