Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2020-07-08 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is just a bit better than the Moto G 5G Plus, having a score of 85 against 82.6. The iPhone 8 body is incredibly lighter and thinner than Moto G 5G Plus, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. The iPhone 8 counts with a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory and lesser cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone 8 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a much smaller display, a just a little worse screen pixel density and a lot lower 750 x 1334 resolution. The Moto G 5G Plus has a superior camera than iPhone 8, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor and a bigger camera aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations.
The iPhone 8 features just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Moto G 5G Plus counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.