Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2020-07-08 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is a bit better than the Google Pixel 2, with a general score of 82.6 against 81.6. Although the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is notably newer than Google Pixel 2, it is much heavier and somewhat thicker. The Google Pixel 2 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixel count in each display inch.
The Google Pixel 2 has a processing unit that's just as good as Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's CPU, both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85% bigger battery capacity. Moto G 5G Plus features a better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a much bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.