Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2020-07-08 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has an overall score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel XL's 81.3 general score. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's design is way newer than the Google Pixel XL's, although it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Google Pixel XL counts with a bit better looking display than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity per display inch and a quite better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Moto G 5G Plus has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Moto G 5G Plus has a bit faster processor than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a higher number of cores.
The Moto G 5G Plus captures better videos and photos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures.
The Moto G 5G Plus features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.