Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Moto G 5G Plus, having an 83.7 score against 82.6. The LG V50 ThinQ body is a little thinner and lighter than Moto G 5G Plus, although it was released just 14 months before. The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processor than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG V50 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Moto G 5G Plus captures much clearer videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more MP camera.
The Moto G 5G Plus has greater battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.