Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2020-07-08 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| LCD | TFT |
| 409 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is slightly better than the Moto G 5G Plus, getting a score of 84.7 against 82.6. Galaxy A32's construction is a little bit thicker but a little bit lighter than Moto G 5G Plus, and they were released with only 7 months difference. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a much greater count of pixels per inch in the screen, a way higher 1080 x 2520 resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A32 counts with slightly more storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A32. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Moto G 5G Plus captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a back camera with a 48 megapixels resolution, the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a bigger aperture for better low light images and video.
The Galaxy A32 features a battery lifetime that is very similar to the battery life in Moto G 5G Plus.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.