Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G Plus is a little bit better than Galaxy A60, getting a general score of 82.6 against 82.3. Moto G 5G Plus's construction is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than Galaxy A60. Galaxy A60 counts with a display that's just as good as the display in Moto G 5G Plus, and although the Galaxy A60 has a bit smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have the same pixel density.
The Moto G 5G Plus has a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A60, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a much larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos and a much more MP camera.
The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.