Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-07-08 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Surfing blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) is a bit better than Moto G 5G Plus, getting an 84.2 score against 82.6. Galaxy A7 (2018) is an older cellphone than the Moto G 5G Plus, but it is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Galaxy A7 (2018) and Moto G 5G Plus both have extremely similar processors, and although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has a larger amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Moto G 5G Plus and Galaxy A7 (2018) both count with similar displays, because although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has a little bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixel amount in each inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has slightly more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a way higher (4K) video definition, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a much longer battery life than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 52% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.