Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Moto G 5G Plus, with a 91.8 score against 82.6. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner phone than Moto G 5G Plus, although they were released with only 1 months difference. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a screen that is very similar to Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's screen, and although the Galaxy A71 5G has a just a bit inferior count of pixels per inch of display and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, they both have a screen of the same size. Galaxy A71 5G has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB, the Galaxy A71 5G also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera and a larger sensor.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.