Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, with an 84.9 score against 82.6. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A80 is an older, just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier phone than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus. Galaxy A80 features a processor that's just as good as the processing unit in Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although the Galaxy A80 has a greater amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Moto G 5G Plus features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a just a little greater pixels density. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with better battery duration than Galaxy A80, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Moto G 5G Plus shoots slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a 0.5 inches sensor and the same video quality, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.