Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2020-07-08 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's 82.6 general score. The Galaxy A90 5G is an older phone than the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, but it is a little lighter and a bit thinner anyway. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit better processing power than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a display that is just as good as the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus one, and although the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little lower pixel quantity per inch of display, they both have a screen with the same size. The Galaxy A90 5G features a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features just a bit better camera than Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking images or videos in low light environments, they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega pixels resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same sensor size and the same video quality.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.