Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-07-08 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a general score of 82.6, which is a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 general score. Although Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is incredibly newer than Galaxy C9 Pro, it is notably thicker and just a bit heavier. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a bit better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit larger display, a little greater pixels density and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Moto G 5G Plus takes greater photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Moto G 5G Plus has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G Plus has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.