Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, getting an 82.6 score against 79.3. Although Moto G 5G Plus is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, it is extremely thicker and notably heavier. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has more CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a sharper screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels count per display inch and a little higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G Plus captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality pictures, a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.