Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-08 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Surfing blue | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G Plus has a score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Despite of the fact Moto G 5G Plus is way older and a lot thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still a bit lighter. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a bit greater pixels count per display inch and a larger display.
Moto G 5G Plus has a very superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit superior battery life than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a better camera than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot higher video resolution, a higher 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.