Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPS | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than the Moto G 5G, with an 81.6 score against 81.5. Google Pixel 2's body is noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner than Moto G 5G, even though it was released 3 years before. Google Pixel 2 has a little faster processor than Moto G 5G. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Google Pixel 2 features a slightly better looking screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels count in each inch of screen. The Moto G 5G counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Moto G 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited environments and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.