Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Moto G 5G, with an 83.7 score against 81.5. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 10 OS, so both of them should give you identical operating system features. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto G 5G, despite of the fact that it was released just a bit more than a year before.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G 5G, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM. Moto G 5G features a little bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photos and video and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto G 5G also counts with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Moto G 5G features improved battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.