Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G 5G, with a 91.8 score against 81.5. Although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G were only released with a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is thinner and lighter. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G 5G. Both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, a screen of the same size and a higher count of pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy A71 5G has a little faster CPU than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a much better camera than Moto G 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G has a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB, the Galaxy A71 5G also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto G 5G counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.