Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G 5G, having a general score of 87.1 against 81.5. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note9 is extremely older than the Motorola Moto G 5G, it's body is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note9 features a slightly better display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and more pixels per inch of screen. The Moto G 5G shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G 5G also counts with a camera with a much better 48 MP resolution.
The Galaxy Note9 has a slightly better memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G 5G, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with better battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.