Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.3 | 62.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 10 |
| 2013-11-13 | 2020-10-19 |
| 5.11 x 2.59 x 0.46 inches | 5.93 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink, Red, White and Yellow | Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 99.00 | $ 89.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset | MediaTek Helio A22 MT6761 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8300 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2070mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 350 hours standby time | -- |
| 4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 2 V Tella has a score of 62.1, which is a bit better than the Moto G's global score of 60.3. Even though the Nokia 2 V Tella is way heavier than the Moto G, it's thinner and noticeably newer. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Nokia 2 V Tella has 10 version and Moto G has Android 5.0, providing the user some extra features.
Motorola Moto G has a more vivid screen than Nokia 2 V Tella, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1280 x 720px, it also counts with a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Nokia 2 V Tella counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, and they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 2 V Tella also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory.
Nokia 2 V Tella captures a little bit better photos and videos than Moto G, because it has a camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot higher 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition. The Nokia 2 V Tella has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 128 GB and 16 GB internal storage.
Nokia 2 V Tella counts with a much longer battery duration than Moto G, because it has a 45% more battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Nokia 2 V Tella is also cheap compared to the Motorola Moto G, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.