Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Pearl white | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a score of 84.9, which is better than Motorola Moto G Fast's overall score of 72.2. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, while Motorola Moto G Fast works with Android 11 OS. Even when Apple iPhone 11 Pro and Motorola Moto G Fast were released with only a couple months difference, Apple iPhone 11 Pro is just a little lighter and thinner.
The iPhone 11 Pro has a more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a 64-bit CPU. IPhone 11 Pro counts with an incredibly better screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a way greater screen density.
Moto G Fast has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Moto G Fast has better battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro shoots clearer photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller aperture, a lower (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a way lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Fast. So if you need that extra features, you can buy iPhone 11 Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Moto G Fast, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.