Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 969.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 7 Plus is better than Moto G Fast, with a general score of 83.8 against 72.2. Apple iPhone 7 Plus's construction is a little bit lighter and thinner than the Moto G Fast, even though it was released many years before. IPhone 7 Plus features a better looking screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution.
IPhone 7 Plus counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. IPhone 7 Plus has a bit superior processing unit than Moto G Fast, although it has 4 less cores , they both have the same RAM memory amount.
The Moto G Fast captures a little bit better photographs and videos than iPhone 7 Plus, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto G Fast also has a back camera with a way higher resolution, a bigger aperture and a larger sensor. Moto G Fast counts with a really longer battery performance than iPhone 7 Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2900mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 7 Plus is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G Fast. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G Fast, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.