Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-06-12 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Pearl white | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G Fast's 72.2 score. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) works with iOS 15.x operating system, while Motorola Moto G Fast counts with Android 11 operating system. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) construction is newer, notably lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G Fast.
Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit lower 750 x 1334 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better count of pixels in each inch in the display. The iPhone SE (2022) features a quite better processing power than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has lesser cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64-bit processor.
Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. Moto G Fast features a little bit better camera than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto G Fast also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low light environments.
Moto G Fast counts with a really longer battery duration than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 98% bigger battery capacity.
IPhone SE (2022) costs a lot more money than the Moto G Fast, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.