Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Pearl white | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is much better than Motorola Moto G Fast, getting an 84.5 score against 72.2. Despite of the fact Apple iPhone XS Max is older and a bit heavier than Motorola Moto G Fast, it's design is still somewhat thinner. The iPhone XS Max features a superior performance than Moto G Fast, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and more RAM.
Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a little bit larger display, a way higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 and a much better display pixel density. Apple iPhone XS Max features just a bit better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower resolution, a lower video quality and a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Motorola Moto G Fast features much more memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Fast features longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Fast. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Moto G Fast, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.