Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2024-01-08 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Pearl white | Phantom Black and Rebel Grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is better than the Moto G Fast, getting an 84.2 score against 72.2. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is a notably newer and just a little thinner phone than Moto G Fast, but it's somewhat heavier. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has the newer 14 version while Moto G Fast has Android 11 version.
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Moto G Fast, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little larger display and a better screen density. Moto G Fast has a very superior processing power than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Moto G Fast, because it has a 38 percent bigger battery size.
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has a very superior camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light captures, it also counts with a camera with much more megapixels, a lot higher video definition and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.