Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.73 x 3.06 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black Glare |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone II has an overall score of 88, which is way better than Moto G Fast's 72.2 global score. Despite being the best in this review, Asus ROG Phone II is an older, just a little thicker and much heavier cellphone than the Moto G Fast. Asus ROG Phone II counts with a brighter screen than Moto G Fast, because it has a way better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, more pixels per screen inch and a little bigger screen.
Asus ROG Phone II has a bit better processor than Moto G Fast, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ROG Phone II also has more RAM. The Asus ROG Phone II features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Fast, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Asus ROG Phone II features a much better camera than Moto G Fast, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Asus ROG Phone II also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos, a camera in the back with a much better resolution and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Asus ROG Phone II counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.