Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a score of 80.3, which is much better than Moto G Fast's 72.2 global score. Google Nexus 6P's construction is somewhat thinner and a little lighter than the Moto G Fast, even though it was released 5 years before. Google Nexus 6P counts with a much better screen than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better screen pixels density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G Fast, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Google Nexus 6P's processor is just as good as the processor in Motorola Moto G Fast, both of them have a 3 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Moto G Fast counts with a little longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh. Moto G Fast takes a bit better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Fast also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a way higher 16 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G Fast. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola Moto G Fast, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.