Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is better than Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. The Google Pixel 2 is an older cellphone than Moto G Fast, but it is thinner and way lighter anyway. Google Pixel 2 counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 2 features a better screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels. The Google Pixel 2 has just a bit more storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Moto G Fast features a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Moto G Fast takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G Fast also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in low light environments and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 2 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.