Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is much better than the Moto G Fast, getting an 81.3 score against 72.2. Although Google Pixel XL is way older than the Moto G Fast, it's body is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. The Google Pixel XL counts with a sharper screen than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater pixel quantity per inch of display and a way higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Google Pixel XL features a little bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G Fast features a little better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
The Motorola Moto G Fast features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a smaller sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto G Fast also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a bigger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola Moto G Fast counts with a little longer battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G Fast, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G Fast. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G Fast, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.