Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Pearl white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is slightly better than Moto G Fast, with a score of 77 against 72.2. LG V20 is an incredibly older phone than the Moto G Fast, but it's somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter anyway. The LG V20 features a more vivid display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better display density and a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Moto G Fast counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG V20, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores (although they are slower). Moto G Fast shoots a little bit better photos and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a 0.36 inches back camera sensor, the same video frame rates, a camera with a 16 mega pixels and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G Fast also has a larger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments.
LG V20 has a much better memory to install applications and games than Moto G Fast, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto G Fast has greater battery life than LG V20, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
The LG V20 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.