Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Pearl white | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30 has an overall score of 79.1, which is slightly better than the Moto G Fast's global score of 72.2. The LG V30 is an older cellphone than the Moto G Fast, but LG managed to build it lighter and thinner anyway. The LG V30 has a much sharper display than Moto G Fast, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and way more pixels per display inch.
The LG V30 has just a bit better processing power than Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V30 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG V30 features a superior storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Fast, because it has 32 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto G Fast and LG V30 have very similar cameras, because although the LG V30 has a smaller sensor, and they both have a 16 mega-pixels back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola Moto G Fast features better battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 21 percent larger battery capacity.
The LG V30 costs a lot more money than the Moto G Fast, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.