Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-06-12 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.37 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Pearl white | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than Moto G Fast's 72.2 general score. The LG V50 ThinQ body is a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than Moto G Fast, even though it was released about a year before. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Moto G Fast has Android 11 version.
LG V50 ThinQ has an incredibly better looking screen than Moto G Fast, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a lot more pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher 1440 x 3120px resolution. LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Fast, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Fast, because although it has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor and a larger aperture. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Fast, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the Moto G Fast one.
LG V50 ThinQ is more expensive than Moto G Fast, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.